The Berlin SPD and the Berlin Greens decided on Monday, October 19, to enter coalition negotiations with the Left Party (Tagesschau, Handelsblatt, FAZ). According to Handelsblatt, the SPD state executive board approved by 26:3. The Greens decided in the evening at a small party convention; according to Handelsblatt, of 45 delegates there were officially two votes against, later there was talk of probably four, because some ballot cards had been overlooked. The Left Party has not yet voted, according to Tagesschau. The basis is the exploratory paper by lead candidates Elif Eralp, Graf and Steffen Krach. Giffey warned of the socialization of housing (Handelsblatt), Banaszak criticized comparisons between the AfD and the Left Party (FAZ).
With the decisions, the three parties move from exploratory talks to formal negotiations; only a coalition agreement, which the party bodies must approve, would establish a government. Because the Left Party, as the election winner, is next to move, the timetable depends on its still pending decision.
For Berliners nothing changes for now: the current Senate stays in office as long as there is no new coalition agreement. Anyone affected by rent policy, housing stock or the state budget will find the negotiating topics in the exploratory paper.
Supporters in the SPD and the Greens see the exploratory paper as a workable basis. According to Handelsblatt, the Greens delegates approved by a large majority, and Banaszak rejected comparisons between the AfD and the Left Party, according to the FAZ.
Critics point to the risks of the alliance: Giffey warned of the consequences of socialization (Handelsblatt), the Union attacked the plan sharply beforehand, and there were three votes against in the SPD state executive board. According to Handelsblatt, resistance in the SPD parliamentary group had grown beforehand.
Confirmed are the approval by the SPD state executive board and the Greens party convention. Open are the Left Party’s decision, the start date of the negotiations and how to handle the socialization of large housing holdings. To watch are when the Left Party votes and whether the SPD parliamentary group follows the course.
Tagesschau (votes by SPD and Greens, Oct. 19, 2026) · Handelsblatt (26:3 vote and Greens party convention, Oct. 19, 2026) · FAZ (live blog, Oct. 19, 2026)
Berlin SPD and Greens vote for coalition negotiations with the Left Party – SPD state executive board backs it 26:3
A small Greens party convention follows with a broad majority; the Left Party, as the election winner, has not yet voted.
The Berlin SPD and the Berlin Greens decided on Monday to enter coalition negotiations with the Left Party. Tagesschau, Handelsblatt and FAZ report this. The SPD state executive board approved first; Handelsblatt cites a vote of 26:3. The Greens followed in the evening: at a small party convention, a broad majority of the 45 delegates voted for negotiations, according to Handelsblatt; officially there were two votes against, later there was talk of probably four, because some ballot cards had been overlooked. The vote by the Left Party, which won the election, is still pending, according to Tagesschau; Handelsblatt writes that the party is still taking its time. The basis is the exploratory paper by the lead candidates Elif Eralp (Left Party), Graf (Greens) and Steffen Krach (SPD), presented on Saturday. According to Handelsblatt, the vote was preceded by weeks of criticism: first the Union attacked the possible alliance, then resistance grew in the SPD parliamentary group.
The decision comes amid a debate over the role of the Left Party. Economic Affairs Senator Franziska Giffey of the SPD warned, according to Handelsblatt, of the consequences of the socialization of housing. Greens leader Felix Banaszak criticized comparisons between the AfD and the Left Party, according to the FAZ live blog. With the decisions, the three parties move from exploratory talks to formal negotiations; there is no coalition agreement, and the party bodies would still have to approve one. The reports give no date for the start of the talks.