In the early hours of October 14, remarks by Trump were published: “We will land a hard blow on Iran, we’ve had enough” (Ynet, mako, Globes, in Hebrew translation). A senior White House official told Kan 11 that the reports of a US strike on Iran before the midterm elections are untrue. Axios and mako reported a conversation between Trump and Netanyahu, the Jerusalem Post reported that the US and Israel are considering resuming military actions, and the Times of Israel wrote that Netanyahu urged Trump to resume the fighting before the elections; the Prime Minister’s Office denies it. Channel 12 reported, according to FinancialJuice, that there is no intelligence change that would justify a move in the coming weeks, that Israel, the US and the Gulf states are coordinating preparations for various scenarios, and that Iran carried out a series of ballistic missile tests in recent days. According to the army, as reported there, the missile arsenal is being rebuilt slowly and partially. Reuters reported, citing official sources, that Iran is changing tactics to step up attacks on shipping before the US election.
Resuming the fighting against Iran would change Israel’s security situation and the oil market. Two weeks before the election in Israel and less than three weeks before the midterm elections, any such report is also read through a political lens, so it is important to separate what was said publicly from what was reported from anonymous sources.
No new guidance for the public was given in the reports available to us. A headline about an “imminent strike” is a report and not a decision; official guidance comes from the Home Front Command. Anyone flying via the Gulf should check the airline’s notices.
Those who see a close military move as a real possibility point to Trump’s public threats, to Iran’s missile tests and to the attacks on shipping, and conclude that waiting only strengthens that possibility.
A skeptic notes that the reports of pressure from Netanyahu rely on anonymous sources, that the Office and the White House deny them, and that they are published at the height of the campaign, so it is hard to know who has an interest in their publication.
This is a week of threats and denials, not of decisions. It is worth looking for something verifiable: movement of forces, new Home Front Command guidance, an official statement from the White House or from the Prime Minister’s Office. Until then every version is somebody’s claim, and we mark it as such.
Ynet, mako, Globes, Kan 11, Channel 7, Times of Israel, Axios, Jerusalem Post, Reuters, Middle East Eye, FinancialJuice (October 12-14, 2026)
Trump: “We will land a hard blow on Iran”; White House denies plan for a strike before the midterm elections
Reports in Israel and the US describe a conversation between Trump and Netanyahu about resuming the fighting in Iran. The Prime Minister’s Office denies that Netanyahu urged it, and no source available to us reports a decision.
In the early hours of October 14, remarks by US President Donald Trump on Iran were published, in Hebrew translation: “We will land a hard blow on it, we’ve had enough” (Ynet, mako, Globes). Ynet quotes him on a “chess game” and links it to the claim that Iran is changing tactics to influence the election. The day before, on October 12, he said that the midterm elections, the elections to Congress on November 3, have no influence at all on his decisions regarding Iran (Kan 11, Channel 7).
At the same time, reports were published about a conversation between Trump and Netanyahu. Axios wrote about a shared dilemma: to strike in Iran before the election or to wait. mako reported a conversation about a new operation, and the Times of Israel wrote that Netanyahu urged Trump to resume the fighting before the elections in both countries; the Prime Minister’s Office denies it. A senior White House official told Kan 11 that the reports of a US strike before the midterm elections are untrue. Channel 12 reported, according to FinancialJuice, that there is no intelligence change that would justify an Israeli-American move in the coming weeks. According to the same report, Iran carried out a series of ballistic missile launch tests in recent days, and the army estimates that its missile arsenal is being rebuilt slowly and partially.
The escalation continued in the region. On October 13 Trump said that the Houthis are trying to raise oil prices before the midterm elections, and according to Middle East Eye even “at Iran’s request” (Reuters). According to Reuters he also said that he does not believe China and Russia are helping Iran “at all,” but the WSJ published overnight, as an exclusive, that the Houthis are building an advanced missile with the help of Chinese components; this is a report by a single outlet. Houthi missiles hit the Aramco headquarters in Dhahran, and the Saudi-led coalition attacked targets in Sanaa (details in the side column). Oil prices rose, according to Reuters, as traders weighed the risk to Saudi supply.
Tension also continued in the Strait of Hormuz. Reuters reported, citing official sources, that Iran is changing tactics to step up attacks on shipping before the US election. FinancialJuice bulletins, which we cannot verify separately, quote UKMTO on a tanker hit in the strait, Iranian media on threatening missile fire at “violating ships,” and US Central Command on assisting in the passage of more than 19 million barrels of oil through the strait. And in Britain the head of MI5 said that Iran is targeting military sites and that the suspected plot against the Fairford base is “not unique” (AP); Reuters wrote that Iran and Russia are stepping up hybrid campaigns there. We reported Britain’s accusation regarding Fairford in the previous edition.
Background: the election in Israel is on October 27, and in the US on November 3, and both leaders are in campaign mode. Eisenkot also said on Army Radio, according to Israel Hayom, that setting the overthrow of the regime in Iran as a goal was a mistake. The Iranian question has entered the election debate, and that makes the reports harder to read. Those who see a close military move as a real possibility point to the public threats and to the report of a conversation between the leaders. A skeptic points to the denials, to the anonymous sources, and to the fact that Channel 12 reports no change in intelligence.
DailyDrop notes: what was confirmed is Trump’s public threat, the denials and the reports of a conversation. It was not confirmed that a strike is planned or that a date has been set, and Trump’s remarks reached us in Hebrew translation and not from a transcript. The details of the hit on Aramco came in differing versions, and a claim that the headquarters was evacuated, published in Iranian media, is unverified and sits in the “Unverified” block.