A 20-year-old man from Capelle aan den IJssel was arrested last week on suspicion of a terrorist offense. The Public Prosecution Service announced it on Tuesday (NOS, NU.nl, AD, De Telegraaf, Rijnmond). He is suspected of threatening to commit a terrorist offense and of preparing one; according to a statement from the OM, he will remain in custody for longer. NU.nl writes that, according to the person who made the report, he wanted to cause as many victims as possible; the AD writes that he is said to have said so. De Telegraaf reports that a sword, knives and an air gun were found (one source). The AD writes that the police prevented a possible attack. Motive, ideology, target and time are not mentioned in the reports we saw.
A suspicion of terrorism directly affects the safety of people living nearby and trust in the investigation. At the same time the man has not been convicted and the most important details are unconfirmed. The case also shows that a report from someone in his surroundings can be the trigger for an arrest.
For residents of Capelle and the surrounding area we have seen no call from the police or the municipality and no report of danger to the public. If you are worried about someone in your own circle, you can report it to the police.
Those who read the arrest positively see a successful intervention: someone who made a report, a swift arrest and an attack prevented (AD).
Those who are cautious point out that the statement ‘as many victims as possible’ was passed on by others and that the judge has yet to assess the evidence.
Hold on to the difference between suspicion and proof. Over the coming days, watch whether the OM says anything about motive and evidence, and what the examining magistrate decides on pre-trial detention. Until there is clarity on that, ‘as many victims as possible’ remains an attributed statement, not an established plan.
NOS · NU.nl · AD · De Telegraaf · Rijnmond · Public Prosecution Service (Oct. 13)
Police arrest man (20) from Capelle aan den IJssel for preparing a terrorist attack
The Public Prosecution Service announced on Tuesday that the suspect was already arrested last week. According to the reports, he wanted to cause ‘as many victims as possible’. Next to nothing about his motive and his plans has been confirmed.
A 20-year-old man from Capelle aan den IJssel was arrested last week on suspicion of a terrorist offense. That became known on Tuesday (NOS, NU.nl, AD, De Telegraaf, Rijnmond). The Public Prosecution Service (OM) says he is suspected of threatening to commit a terrorist offense and of preparing one. Those are two different suspicions: the first concerns what he is said to have said or written, the second concrete steps to carry it out. According to a statement from the OM, the man will remain in custody for longer. The AD writes that with the arrest the police prevented a possible attack. In criminal law an offense is only ‘terrorist’ if it is intended to instill serious fear in the population or to coerce a government; the OM must therefore also be able to demonstrate that intent. The reports we saw do not name the man.
Note the difference between the date of the event and that of the news: the arrest took place last week, the public heard about it on Tuesday, October 13. The reports are cautious about what the man was planning. NU.nl writes that, according to the person who made the report, the suspect wanted to cause as many victims as possible. The AD writes that he is said to have said so, and Rijnmond also puts the words in quotation marks in its headline. So it is a statement attributed to him, not an established intention. De Telegraaf reports that a sword, knives and an air gun were found on him. That is one source; the other media do not mention those objects in the reports we saw.
What we do not know is a lot. The reports name no motive and no ideology, no target and no time. Nor do they say whether he acted alone or how the police got on his trail, other than that there was someone who made a report (NU.nl). At this stage that is no reason to fill anything in: a suspect has not been convicted and the judge still has to assess the evidence. For residents of Capelle we have seen no call from the police or the municipality, and no report of danger to the public. The details come mainly from statements by the OM and from what the person who made the report is said to have passed on; we saw no investigation by the newsrooms themselves. So expect more to become known in the coming days, for example about the hearing in which the judge decides on pre-trial detention. Until then: this is an arrest and a suspicion, not an established plan, and no report we saw says that anyone was injured.